I agree with both Stacey and Allison about how I often use comprehension
strategies without even thinking about them. When I read I definitely go
through most of the comprehension strategies that the Gregory and Cahill
explained, especially visualization. Usually this only occurs when I am reading
a fiction novel or a story within a non-fiction piece. Often times I feel as if
I am not reading words at all but I am seeing images play in my head. This has
helped me comprehend as I read because I am creating the image in my mind and
able to see things rather than just reading words. Making connections is
another one that I use quite often but perhaps not enough. Sometimes I don’t stop
to think about connections to my own life or things I already know that might
help me better comprehend what I’m reading. I do this randomly as I read but
maybe if I stopped to do it explicitly than my reading comprehension would
increase. Making inferences is definitely one that I use without even stopping
to think about it. This is very important to reading comprehension or else all
readers would be literalist as the Applegate article explained.
Also, as Stacey mentioned many of her students could be put
into the profiles of comprehension I think that each of my students at one time
or another have exhibited one of these profiles. Each profile I read I could
think of at least one student that has shown this. I would need more time in my
classroom seeing reading comprehension assessments to know if these students
always exhibit these profiles.
No comments:
Post a Comment